Misconceptions In Passive Investment
There is a big amount of false info that’s been circulating about the subject of active and passive investment. That is to be expected for a debate that has been raging for a long time now. What’s more, there’s much at stake from salaries of fund managers to retiree’s savings. What’s unfortunate for investors is that, it is not possible to try out other investment opportunities. Instead, choosing a strategy has to do with great deal of analysis and research. Regardless if you are rooting for active or passive, it is extremely important that you make yourself aware of the facts from fiction in order to come up with a well informed decision to how you can invest your hard earned money in the best way possible.
To help refining the debate between the two subjects, here are facts that have to be cleared up regarding passive investment.
Number 1. There is no action – if just passive investing was as simple as placing money in index fund and wait for all money to roll in. Believe it or not, the passive investors may even become performers of portfolio observation, discipline and construction.
When developing a portfolio together with passive investments similar to index funds, the action begins by allocating money strategically among varieties of asset classes that can help in achieving long term financial goal. If ever these allocations change, then more action is to be found with passive investors who rebalance their portfolio diligently by making trades return to assets back into their original level.
Number 2. Passive investing attains returns that are below market averages – it is true that primarily because of the cost but, average returns are in the eye of investors. Index funds seek to replicate market index so even if they do accurately, it’ll be below average for net of fees. However, index funds usually have lower costs when compared to active funds or to put simply, they have better chances to get near market averages for a long period of time.
Active funds are also charging higher fees for personnel to perform research and trades which eats away at returns as well as contribute to abysmal historical record of matching or even beating market averages.
Number 3. Passive investing is deemed as cookie-cutter strategy – due to the reason that passive investment is not managed tactfully to change with market swings or to take advantage of future events, many detractors of it believe that it can’t beat active investment. Actually, there is a benefit from uniformity of passive investing because the same strategy may be applied from one investor to the other.
More reading: Full Report